Nihon Shoryoku Kikai Co., Ltd.

JAPANESE

One and only technology of "Unmanned Plastic Molding Line",
"Patented 3D Profiling Processing", and "Perfect Unmanned Deburring & Trimming"

For more information 0270-40-3111

Home > Process method > Difference from conventional method

Difference from conventional method

Difference of conventional method

The conventional method New proposal, Ultrasonic trimming
Water jet trimming
  • The initial cost and running cost is high.
  • Drainage treatment is necessary.
  • The working environment becomes worse.(The cutting dust and water might be scattered)
  • Greatly reduced running cost.

  • Even if the place does not cut into the rear of the location where you want to cut, can be processed only on the surface.

  • Low noise and small layout.

  • Reduce the maintenance-hours since the expendables are the cutter and its holder only.

  • No cutting dust (Gentle to the environments)
Laser trimming
  • The initial cost and running cost is high.
  • There is a risk of occurrence of fire.
  • A foul smell might be given.
Die trimming
  • The design modification of the product is hard.
  • Special Dies are required in the respective.
  • The maintenance works of the die is hard.

Comparison; Ultrasonic Cutter vs Water jet

Water jet Ultrasonic cutter
Investment cost
Foot print
Running cost ◎ (80% reduction)
Water process ◎ (No need)
Cutting surface
Cutting speed(straight)
Cutting speed(curve)
Expendables
Cutting dust
Kiss cut
このページの先頭へ